Part-time sitter (A$800/month)
At this level, the commission model costs A$1,920/year. The Pro founding rate is a flat €199/year + VAT however much you bill, so most of that A$1,920 stays with you.
Wag! does not publish a caregiver commission rate, so the 20% below is the marketplace-standard figure, modelled rather than quoted. A flat subscription costs the same regardless of how much you earn. Here is how the economics compare over 12 months.
| Metric | The Pet Sitter | Wag! |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue model | Flat subscription | 20% commission per booking |
| Sitter cost structure | Predictable annual fee | Scales with your revenue |
| Client relationship | Sitter-owned | Platform-controlled |
| Focus | Professional pet sitters | On-demand dog walking + sitting |
Commission marketplaces generate revenue by taking a percentage of each transaction processed through the platform. This model aligns platform growth with transaction volume.
Commission models lower the barrier to entry and help build marketplace liquidity quickly. For casual sitters or those starting out, paying only when you earn reduces risk. On-demand models particularly benefit from this structure because they need a large pool of available workers.
Wag! publishes its owner-side booking fees but no caregiver-side percentage anywhere on its own support site (checked 6 September 2026), so the 20% modelled throughout this page is the standard marketplace rate and not a Wag! figure — check your own statements. Wag! is focused primarily on the US market. It emphasises on-demand dog walking alongside pet sitting, with algorithmic job assignment. Wag! has operated as a publicly listed company and faces the pressures of quarterly earnings reporting, which can influence platform economics and sitter experience.
The economic comparison between a 20% commission and a flat subscription follows the same pattern regardless of the specific platform.
The Pet Sitter's Free plan costs €0 and takes 0% commission. Measured against the Pro plan's founding rate of €199/year + VAT, a 20% commission costs the same at approximately €83/month in bookings. Above that threshold, every additional dollar earned is kept in full under the subscription model.
At this level, the commission model costs A$1,920/year. The Pro founding rate is a flat €199/year + VAT however much you bill, so most of that A$1,920 stays with you.
A 20% commission at this revenue level is A$4,800/year. The Pro founding rate stays at €199/year + VAT, so almost all of that A$4,800 is retained earnings instead.
At full-time professional revenue, commission reaches A$9,600/year. A flat €199/year + VAT subscription is a small fraction of that.
On-demand platforms with algorithmic assignment add another dynamic: sitters have less control over which clients they serve and less ability to build repeat relationships. Under a model that supports direct client relationships, the compounding benefit of repeat clients amplifies the economic advantage of flat-fee pricing.
Estimate your annual platform costs based on your monthly booking revenue.
Annual platform cost on Wag!
€4,800
20% commission on your booking revenue
Annual cost on The Pet Sitter
€199+ VAT
Flat subscription, no commission
Estimated annual fee savings with The Pet Sitter
€4,601
Based on fee difference only
Wag! does not publish a caregiver-side commission percentage on its own support site (checked 6 September 2026); the owner-side booking fees below are published. The 20% used here is the standard rate across pet-care marketplaces, shown as an illustration rather than as Wag!'s published rate — check your own Wag! statements for the rate you actually pay.
Wag! figures are converted from their published price at an approximate rate, for comparison only. The Pet Sitter price shown here is the amount Checkout charges in euros (EUR).
| Annual gross booking revenue | €24,000 |
|---|---|
| Estimated net on Wag! | €19,200 |
| Estimated net on The Pet Sitter | €23,801 |
Wag! charges pet owners a flat booking fee: US$2.99 per walk-type service and US$14.99 for sitting and boarding.
The Pet Sitter charges neither side of a booking.
Structural differences between the two business models.
Percentage of each transaction
Fixed annual subscription
Your booking revenue
Nothing — cost is fixed
Platform-controlled, algorithmic
Sitter-owned, direct
Often algorithmic / on-demand
Client chooses sitter directly
Same commission on every booking
No incremental cost per booking
Limited — you are a worker in the platform
You are building your own business
Transaction volume
Revenue scales with bookings processed. The platform is incentivised to maximise throughput.
Worker fungibility
On-demand models benefit from interchangeable workers. This prioritises availability over individual sitter relationships.
Public market metrics
Publicly traded platforms must report quarterly growth. This can influence pricing, commission rates, and sitter experience.
Sitter retention
Revenue depends on sitters finding ongoing value. The platform is incentivised to make sitters successful.
Individual reputation
The model supports sitters building personal brands and direct client relationships.
Business autonomy
Sitters control their schedule, pricing, and client relationships without algorithmic assignment.
Wag!'s on-demand model treats sitters more as gig workers than business owners. Algorithmic job assignment and platform-controlled pricing limit the ability to build a personal brand or client base. A subscription infrastructure model treats sitters as independent professionals.
The choice depends on whether you want gig-style work or are building an independent business.
On-demand platforms let you pick up walks and sits when you have free time without building a client base.
Wag! has significant demand in US cities. If you need bookings today, their existing client base is an advantage.
If you prefer to show up, do the work, and leave the client management to the platform, on-demand models handle that.
A fixed cost is more efficient than a 20% commission once you have regular bookings.
Direct client relationships mean repeat bookings, referrals, and a business that grows under your control.
A subscription model does not control or influence your pricing. You decide what your services are worth.
Building a personal brand and client base creates long-term business value. Gig work on a platform does not.
You can start on Free with your own profile page, permanent booking link, bookings, messaging and limited client records. Pro adds business tools including invoice generation when available. Check the pricing page for current Pro availability and the applicable offer; signing up for Free does not reserve a founding subscription. In-product sitter search is on the roadmap.
If you need immediate gig-style work in the US today, Wag! and similar on-demand platforms may serve that need better right now.
What we are building is infrastructure for professional sitters who want to own their business. Predictable costs, direct client relationships, and growth that is not taxed at 20% per booking. If that aligns with where you are heading, we would like to build this with you.
In US cities where Wag! is active, yes. Their on-demand model provides quick access to jobs. The trade-off is ongoing 20% commission and limited ability to build your own client relationships.
Gig platforms assign you work and take a cut. You are a worker in their system. A business infrastructure model gives you tools to find, serve, and retain your own clients. You build equity in your reputation and client relationships.
The Pet Sitter's Free plan costs nothing, with 0% commission. Against the Pro plan's founding rate of €199/year + VAT, a 20% commission costs more above approximately €83/month in bookings. Most regular sitters pass this threshold quickly.
We believe professional pet care should be infrastructure-enabled, not commission-gated.
Your tools. Your clients. Your business.